<

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Reservoir height's effect on production in horizontal well

  1. #1

    Reservoir height's effect on production in horizontal well

    In a vertical well, the production rate is proportional to the height h. This is understandable, as one can imagine two reservoirs on top of each other if the h is doubled. However, according to popular equations (Joshi's and so on) this is also true for a horizontal well. This does not make sense to me.. Any ideas?

  2. # ADS
    Spons Circuit
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    508
    It does make sense if you think about the analogy of partial penetration - ie you have a 50 ft net pay reservoir with vertical well, which you only perforate 10ft of.... For sure you will have some rate reduction compared to perforating the entire zone, but it will not be one fifth of the production rate... and intuitively you'd expect the reduction to be affected in large part by the vertical perm over the unperforated section (ie how easily can the fluids migrate up to the pressure sink)

    Similarly, horizontal wells benefit from more height

    While the Joshi equation (1988) does have height terms in the denominator as well (which mean it will not predict rates increasingly directly in proportion with height), the more complex analytical horizontal well equations seem to take this effect into account better. Using the set of equations outlined in SPE 97190 by H.Y. Chen & N. Assad, and taking as example for the following geometry predict the following outcome;
    Skin = 0
    rw = 0.3ft
    Visc = 0.8 cP
    B = 1.08
    Kx = Ky = 150mD
    Kz = 1mD
    Length = 500ft
    Vertical Penetration = 10ft
    Azimuthal Bearing = 0 degrees
    Centered in reservoir 3000ft x 3000ft arealy
    1,500 psi drawdown

    Thickness (ft) Rate (bpd)
    10 7,212
    25 11,651
    50 13,630
    100 13,939

    If you increase the vertical perm to 15mD, you get;
    Thickness (ft) Rate (bpd)
    10 8,659
    25 18,646
    50 29,119
    100 38,631

    Again, unsurprisingly you get (a) more rate with more net, (b) increased rate benefit per net ft addition with higher Kv/Kh and (c) Higher rates with higher Kv/Kh period

    Takeaways are - while more net yields more rate, you need reasonable Kv/Kh to unlock the value
    Last edited by vinomarky; 10-15-2010 at 07:37 AM.

  4.    Sponsored Links



    -

  5. #3
    Do a little simulation like here.

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]

    Vary reservoir parameters and see what happens. You will learn more this way than through words.

    Take this one data set and modify using OFFICE to see what happens.

    HORZWELL.DATA in ECL Data subdirectory.

    Regards

    “Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
    —Big Oil Executive

  •   

Similar Threads

  1. Production forecast fractured reservoir
    By saladin.ayubi1234 in forum Reservoir
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-11-2014, 06:31 AM
  2. Reservoir and Well production Analysis
    By SenOil in forum Oil And Gas Production
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-28-2013, 08:14 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-26-2013, 01:00 PM
  4. water production issue in dry gas reservoir
    By Smriti in forum Reservoir
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-22-2011, 09:33 AM
  5. Tight reservoir need help for production
    By amitkannojia in forum Reservoir
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-02-2010, 03:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •