<

Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 118

Thread: Reservoir Simulation and History Matching

  1. #1

    Reservoir Simulation and History Matching

    In this discussion

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]



    in the Pet. Software section I got the idea that it would be a good idea to have a thread just about how you do this. We can not go too much into the details as we will never see the model someone is working on, but I think general ideas and suggestions might be sufficient to help people in this area.

    For myself I can say I have done some but not enough to say I am an expert as in our business you need to do 10 different things at a time and can not often spend a lot of time in one area. That was my working environment, "Now your on project X doing y, then your on project Y doing s." Never in one very long.

    Well here we go ....

    In the discussion I mentioned above someone was asking about a program SLB has called SIMOPT. I had once looked at it in my spare time. Using gradient sensitivities the programs helps to find a better history match. That sounds easy in those few words but requires much more work and understanding of what is happening.

    With this in mind I would suggest the following work available for free which explains a bit this process in another application.

    Sensitivity-Based History Matching Algorithms and Streamline Methods
    The prominence of sensitivity-based history matching algorithms can be largely attributed to the rapid convergence they exhibit. Because of the computational challenge posed by even the smallest of field-scale history-matching endeavors, it becomes imperative for the computation of sensitivity coefficients to be as efficient as practically possible. One of the distinguishing features of streamline-based history matching algorithms is their superior efficiency in computing sensitivity coefficients.1 It
    is the rapid sensitivity computation and thus applicability of the streamline-based method achieved in two phase applications that motivates the extension to three-phase production data researched in this work. The efficacy of the approach in calculating sensitivities is a direct consequence of the nature of the streamline formulation for modeling the dynamics
    of fluid flow. In the streamline domain, the flow and transport equations are decoupled with a resulting reduction of the solution of a three-dimensional problem to a series of one-dimensional problems.14 In chapter II, we discuss the streamline formulation for the forward problem, and the sensitivity formulation for the inverse problem is detailed in chapter III
    The above comes from here which I recommend to read

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]
    Another good article from someone doing the work for a client and what the client was complaining about is this one

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]
    Some parameters are not important AT CERTAIN TIMES to the end result from a simulation. This is where sensitivities can tell you a lot (what to focus on).

    Last edited by Shakespear; 08-26-2009 at 10:59 AM.
    Regards

    “Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
    —Big Oil Executive

  2. # ADS
    Spons Circuit
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    Thank you for your supports!

    Cheers,
    Bratek

  4.    Sponsored Links



    -

  5. #3
    Here we have an excellent paper for those new to Reservoir Simulation History Matching.

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]

    We discuss the idea that the “true” model (represented here by the base case) is not necessarily the most likely to be obtained using conventional history-matching methods.
    This is the BIG problem. You do not know if you are even close to the "true" model when you get your best match of Historical Production and what the model Response is over the same time frame. Hence you Predictions are always in question.

    In the Real World we do not have TIME to think long. Someone wants an answer in a week and you must give ONE !!!!!
    Last edited by Shakespear; 08-26-2009 at 10:43 AM.
    Regards

    “Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
    —Big Oil Executive

  6. can u plz share ECLIPSE 2008 or 2009 (preferable)??

  7. #5
    Our good friend Mid has kindly uploaded for us some papers related to history matching. You can find them here

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]
    Do look at this paper as it talks about history matching process commonly used today.

    SPE-96410

    Ziishan

    Use the search option to try and find things you need. You will find it.
    Last edited by Shakespear; 09-22-2009 at 10:27 AM.
    Regards

    “Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
    —Big Oil Executive

  8.    Spons.


  9. Thanks for this papers.

  10. #7
    I recommend looking at this paper provided to us by kamal-shawqi

    Engineering Control in Reservoir Simulation: Part I

    In the thread

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]

    Regards

    “Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
    —Big Oil Executive

  11. #8
    Nice and detailed study showing how to do History Matching ...

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]
    Enjoy

    Regards

    “Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
    —Big Oil Executive

  12. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    ALA, KZ
    Posts
    436
    Shakespear, thanks for information.
    I is really good.
    But did you tried to make assited history matching without Simopt.
    As i understand for doing this you need model ( sim model)
    Several test runs with changed parameter
    Based on this run you build vertical and horizontal function of parameter

  13. #10
    I have used Simopt before and it can be useful. However it WILL NOT do the History Matching for you. It will give you clues but only if you use it right. Using it right requires understanding the whole History Matching process and how Simopt (math behind it) works.

    Yes, you need a simulator to use it, if I understand your question right. Simopt modifies the DATA file for Eclipse and then runs ECLIPSE. Looks at the results, does its calculations, modifies the DATA files and runs Eclipse again. ......
    Regards

    “Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
    —Big Oil Executive

  14. #11

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    ALA, KZ
    Posts
    436
    The problem is that simopt as eclipse is a black box
    Changing parameters in near well area should be justified.
    Now i finishing algo wich will make several realization of set of properties ( for ex permx, permy, permz) run the models and make r2 for each wells.
    My quastion was if you have ideas or expertize how to analyse result data and link it to proper desision making

  15.    Spons.


  16. Anyone have e-book of "Practical Reservoir Simulation" by Mike Carlson?
    Thanks in advance

  •   

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-05-2012, 10:12 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 03:00 AM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-14-2010, 11:17 AM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-08-2010, 11:55 PM
  5. Article: Reservoir Simulation and History Matching
    By Shakespear in forum Home Articles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-19-2010, 04:08 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •