<

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 28

Thread: How m, n affect water saturation for different methods

  1. #1

    How m, n affect water saturation for different methods

    Hi
    I am sharing the following sheet with you, which show how water saturation is affected by m, n, Rw for different methods

    It will give better understanding to which affecting what

    Jusy play with these paramters and look at how the vlaues will change
    I hope it will be beneficial

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]
    Mdh


  2. # ADS
    Spons Circuit
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    excellent job dear, thanks. Could you please post some other meterial like this?

  4.    Sponsored Links



    -

  5. Thank you very much !!!!!

  6. #4
    1. Could anyone help me how to calculate the petrophysical parameters like a, m & n??
    2. What average values can we use for sandstones and Limestone??
    3. Anything to share regarding "Formation Water Analysis"??

    Thanks

  7. #5
    m, n values are determined through core analysis from formation factor and resistivty index tests
    RECOMMENDED PARAMETERS:
    for sandstone A = 0.62
    M = 2.15
    N = 2.00
    for carbonates A = 1.0
    M = 2.00
    N = 2.00

    can you be specific on the formation water analysis point
    Mhd

  8.    Spons.


  9. #6
    thanks, how we can find Rw from water analysis?
    If only chlorides are given or we have TDS then how to calculate Rw?

  10. 2. Technical Background

    Current logging tools that measure the dielectric permittivity of reservoir formations normally operate over a wide range in signal frequency from 16 MHz to 1100 MHz. The permittivity measurements from these tools are used to determine the water and oil saturations of reservoir formations. However, the dielectric permittivity of a formation changes with the signal frequency so that an equation that correctly predicts the water and, hence, oil saturation from the formation dielectric permittivity at one frequency may predict incorrect values at other frequencies.

    One method, based on the Hanai-Bruggeman equation, has been developed which uses the same algebraic expression to relate the dielectric permittivity to water saturation. The method is set forth in my earlier patent application Ser. No. 871,730, filed June 6, 1986, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,786,873 and entitled "Improved Method for Evaluating Water Saturation in Petroleum Reservoirs from Dielectric Permittivity." The disclosure in Ser. No. 871,730, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,786,873 is incorporated herein by reference. The method has adjustable parameters to compensate for the frequency dependence of the permittivity. The adjustable parameters are determined from laboratory measurements taken from core samples. However, laboratory measurements of the dielectric permittivity below 100 MHz are often inaccurate because of limitations in laboratory techniques.

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]


  11. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by project12 View Post
    2. Technical Background

    Current logging tools that measure the dielectric permittivity of reservoir formations normally operate over a wide range in signal frequency from 16 MHz to 1100 MHz. The permittivity measurements from these tools are used to determine the water and oil saturations of reservoir formations. However, the dielectric permittivity of a formation changes with the signal frequency so that an equation that correctly predicts the water and, hence, oil saturation from the formation dielectric permittivity at one frequency may predict incorrect values at other frequencies.

    One method, based on the Hanai-Bruggeman equation, has been developed which uses the same algebraic expression to relate the dielectric permittivity to water saturation. The method is set forth in my earlier patent application Ser. No. 871,730, filed June 6, 1986, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,786,873 and entitled "Improved Method for Evaluating Water Saturation in Petroleum Reservoirs from Dielectric Permittivity." The disclosure in Ser. No. 871,730, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,786,873 is incorporated herein by reference. The method has adjustable parameters to compensate for the frequency dependence of the permittivity. The adjustable parameters are determined from laboratory measurements taken from core samples. However, laboratory measurements of the dielectric permittivity below 100 MHz are often inaccurate because of limitations in laboratory techniques.
    Project12,
    Please share your source, or quote it so we know the whole story
    thanks

  12. thanks a lot

  13. #10

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    ALA, KZ
    Posts
    436
    Thanks, man

  14. #11

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    ALA, KZ
    Posts
    436
    Can you supply password for password protected sheets?

  15.    Spons.


  16. Hey friends!

    Does anyone have R.P. Monicard 'Properties of reservoir rocks: core analysis' book to share?

    Tx.

  •   

Similar Threads

  1. Article: Coreplug water saturation (CSW)
    By yasiobasio123 in forum Home Articles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-24-2011, 11:52 AM
  2. Coreplug water saturation (CSW)
    By yasiobasio123 in forum Reservoir
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-21-2011, 06:51 AM
  3. Coreplug water saturation (CSW)
    By yasiobasio123 in forum Geology & Exploration
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-06-2011, 10:29 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-30-2011, 01:13 AM
  5. Water moving at its connate saturation value
    By 06pg22 in forum Reservoir
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-18-2010, 08:19 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •