<

Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Electric submersible pumps fine tuned for gassy wells

  1. #1

    Electric submersible pumps fine tuned for gassy wells

    Electric submersible pumps fine tuned for gassy wells
    Stan Herl, Schlumberger, and David Eudey, Chesapeake Energy


    In general, electric submersible pumps (ESP) do not like gas. Regardless of the source or nature of gas inclusions in the flowstream, problems can occur when the gas reaches the ESP. Recent experience has revealed that selecting the most appropriate gas handling solution is not a simple task. The reason is that gas inclusions can manifest themselves in many ways from massive slugs to entrained bubbles, at a broad spectrum of flow rates and pressures. Different well geometries and completion styles may affect the way gas flows or agglomerates in the flowstream. Accordingly, each situation must be evaluated on its own merit.

    Because the gas flow regime can be variable, real-time monitoring of flow, pressure and temperatures provide valuable information in deciding the best method of gas handling, but it also has significant long-term benefits in detecting changes in the operation that could lead to premature pump failure.

    ESPs generally have a low tolerance for gas, usually no more than 10% to 20% gas volume fraction (GVF). Because ESPs rely on centrifugal force to move fluid, generally radial or a combination of radial and axial, high- and low-pressure areas are created in the pump stage vanes as they rotate. As gas enters the pump, the lighter gas phase will slip apart from the heavier fluid phase and accumulate on the low pressure side of the blade until it finally blocks the passage of the entire vane/vanes in the pump stage (Figure 1).

    In this way, as gas enters the intake stage of an ESP, it will eventually cause the pump to gas lock. Surface equipment used while producing the well can help alleviate this problem. In the case of a switchboard application — fixed speed — the options are limited. However, in a variable speed drive (VSD), the speed of the pump can be changed as the pump load varies due to gas slugging, thus allowing the pump to ride through the slug. In the case discussed later in this article, the VSD was set up in current mode where the drive followed a preset current point to track the operation of the pump in lieu of just shutting the system down. The use of a VSD has its limitations as well. If the GVF is high enough, it will eventually lead to a gas locking condition. When this happens, the flow of liquid stops and the result is a sharp increase in motor winding temperature and a sharp decrease in load on the motor. If the temperature spike is not detected and steps are not taken to immediately remediate it, the ESP can be destroyed. If the flow regime includes gas slugging, the damage can be even more precipitous (Figure 2).



    Dealing with gas

    Over the years, operators and their service partners have developed methods to deal with gas in

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access] wells. These techniques vary from simple to sophisticated. In some cases, the system can be equipped with a shroud that displaces the pump assembly intake point down below the source of gas influx (usually the perforations). Free gas entering the well will experience simple gravity separation and bubble up into the annulus, allowing the liquid phase to enter into the shroud and flow up to the ESP intake.




    This technique is called gas avoidance, as the shroud minimizes the amount of gas reaching the pump’s intake altogether. In deviated wells, gas entry can be avoided by using a weighted self-orienting intake that always draws from the low side of the casing, thus avoiding gas flow that is percolating up the high side due to gravity separation (Figure 3).






    In some cases, gas can be separated in advance of the pump intake either by forcing all production to take a tortuous path to the intake ports or by creating a vortex in the flow stream. For higher GVFs, various rotary techniques can be employed. These add energy to the flowstream to stimulate the separation process. Centrifugal separators assist in separating the gas from the liquid and disperse the gas through discharge ports into the casing to be produced up the annulus.

    Advanced gas handlers (AGH) operate on the principle of homogenizing the produced mixture as it is being passed through the pump, allowing for increased GVF to be handled in a way that surpasses the effectiveness of the centrifugal separator. The AGH homogenizes the gas and liquid phases, compresses a portion of the gas back into solution and induces a gas lift effect in the tubing above the pump. This enables the pump to produce the mixture with a limit of approximately 45% GVF without gas locking, reducing the load on the pump and improving its overall lifting efficiency.

    The most effective technique, in terms of gas handling, employs axial flow technology, which has the capacity to effectively handle GVFs up to 75%. Developed jointly by Institut Français du Pétrole (IFP), Total, and Statoil, the Poseidon gas handling system is a multiphase helicoaxial pump that fits between the ESP intake ports and the ESP itself (Fig. 3). The system is designed for ultra high GVF oil wells or high rate gas wells that require dewatering and are produced by ESPs. It has been characterized as a multiphase gas handler because it can deal with a very broad spectrum of gas flow regimes. It can be installed above a gas separator so separated gas can be vented to the casing annulus, or directly between the pump intake and the pump.

    The device adds axial velocity to the fluid to the point where the centrifugal pump can handle it. It essentially charges the first three impellers of the ESP so that the gas does not accumulate in the vanes and block the passage. Once charged, the pump can efficiently move the resulting liquid/gas mixture without losing its prime. Even if a large slug of gas appears, the pump can usually handle it.

    Experience has shown that companies faced with gassy wells should follow best practices when selecting and implementing gas handling technology. Users recommend that downhole monitoring of pump performance should be employed on all ESPs used in high GVF wells. It is possible to monitor multiple sets of parameters simultaneously using sensors in the pump and motor, transmitting the resulting data uphole multiplexed on the power cable. One set of sensors measures pump/motor parameters such as intake and discharge pressure, motor winding temperature, vibration and current leakage. The VSD measurements such as current, motor-speed and frequency are measured and combined on the same set of data for monitoring and trending. Pump performance can be fine-tuned using the combination of real-time data monitoring and the use of a variable speed drive (VSD) at the surface. The VSD provides the capability to control and manage the ESP during all phases including startup and initial production. Flow rate, dynamic head and drawdown can be optimized and, in many cases, gas slugging effects can be limited.

    One problem with automated systems is frequent shutdowns and automatic re-starts. Each time an ESP re-starts its life expectancy is reduced. Accordingly, it is most desirable to tune the pump so it operates continually, with re-starts eliminated or at least minimized.

    A case in point

    Chesapeake Energy faced several gas-related challenges in one of its US onshore fields. The field includes 26 horizontal producing wells with liquid production rates varying from 100 b/d to 2000 b/d. Gas/liquid ratios (GLR) varied as well from as little as 150 scf/stb to 15,000 scf/stb. Clearly, a one-size-fits-all solution was inappropriate — each well had to be evaluated individually and the optimum solution identified. Wells experienced frequent gas-locking, resulting in lost revenue and production interruptions

    Shutdowns were also experienced because of power outages or surges resulting in field failures. In addition, start up was difficult and getting the well stabilized was even more of a challenge.



  2. # ADS
    Spons Circuit
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2


    The implications of these various problems included short pump run life between 10 and 30 days, unstable production rates and volumes, considerable lost revenue due to downtime and increased field labor by operations and maintenance personnel. Looking at the reservoir as a whole, it was reckoned that the collective problems resulted in a reduced field recovery factor.

    The axial flow gas-handling system was installed on many wells in the field with high GLR’s with improved results over the AGH technology. In addition to improved consistency in production on almost all wells where it was installed, several wells that simply could not be pumped with AGH technology were able to be produced with the axial flow system. This technology increased the window where ESP’s are effective in this gassy oil reservoir.

    A collaborative effort was launched with the objective of ensuring consistent production from all wells at maximum allowable drawdown. The most difficult wells were given special attention, and each well was addressed individually so solutions could be customized. Real-time monitoring was a key factor in developing the right solution for each well. Until the time when Chesapeake installed its own automation system, monitoring was facilitated by the Schlumberger espWatcher surveillance and control system for ESPs, providing 24/7 monitoring to maximize uptime (Figure 4). Ultimately, it was decided that conventional wisdom of protecting a pump with current would not work due to the erratic flow characteristics of a high GVF well, so the ESP was protected by monitoring motor winding temperature. The system ties the downhole motor temperature measurement directly to the motor controller. This enables the ESP to ride through gas slugs without shutting down due to unstable flow rates and still protects the system. A key benefit of the system was that both Chesapeake and Schlumberger could review the data and trends simultaneously through the web hosted system and make informed decisions on how to adjust the pump controls or settings without causing damage to the ESP.

    Using this approach, each well could be considered separately and tuned for consistent performance with very little cycling. Secondarily, by analyzing the production and pump performance data for each well, draw-downs could be optimized. The field telemetry system gathered and transmitted all relevant data to Chesapeake’s production management team and most fine-tuning could be performed remotely without the necessity of a field visit. Pump speed could be varied, backpressure could be tuned and draw-down adjusted. It has been proven that with the implementation of the gas handling system, the ESP being controlled and monitored remotely together with the collaboration between operator and service company, there has been a significant reduction in re-starts. At the very least, by monitoring pump parameters in real-time, Chesapeake found that it can anticipate some field failures before they occur and take steps to minimize downtime and the collateral damage of a major pump failure.


    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]


  4.    Sponsored Links



    -

  •   

Similar Threads

  1. Details on Submersible Pumps
    By ayush842001 in forum Mechanical Engineering
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-11-2012, 11:26 AM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-07-2011, 02:15 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-01-2011, 02:49 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-30-2011, 10:41 PM
  5. Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) parameters
    By ali in forum Oil And Gas Production
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-29-2011, 12:16 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •