Weak Aquifer - ECLIPSE

[06pg22]

Hi,

I come up with a numerical aquifer, overall it is modelled well, but the recovery is too low, my work restricts me to use one production well only, and with this single survivor I need 50~60% FOE.

Is there any one who can modify it to make FOE 50~60%

Any help in this regard will be highly appreciated.

[link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]

[vinomarky]

Can you please rephrase your question, stating more clearly (a) what the problem is and (b) what help you are asking for?

I'm sure its clear to you, but as an outsider without any frame of reference to what you are doing and trying to achieve I do not understand the above post

[06pg22]

eidted

[Tejaswy]

EDit

[vinomarky]

You have a LOT of oil in this model - 3.0879701E+10 stb to be precise..... In order to get 50% FOE you'd need to produce at 100,000 bopd for 846 years...... so first suggestion is to reduce the size of your model (it's currently 30km x 30km x 40m... trying to get 50% FOE with one well is out of the question)

[Tejaswy]

In order to get 50% FOE you'd need to produce at 100,000 bopd for 846 years......

How did you do that calculation?
:/

[vinomarky]

With OIIP = 3.0879701E+10 stb, then for 50% RF you need to produce 15.4 E+9 stb

Assume 100,000 stb/day number of years = 15.4 E+9 / 100,000 / 365 = 421 years

Sorry, must have inadvertently calculated for 100% RF before

[REGI_MAX]

please review your PVT definition, it should be some gas and dissolved gas (???); aquifer matching is coming after the live oil definition. I would first match your production data in material balance with proper PVT-definition, then start with eclipse (the aquifer is the unknown variable that you should define after the MBAL evaluation with live oil)...

this might be helps;-) REGI

[Tejaswy]

I think it is dead oil, the RSVD seems to be nulled out to me.PVDO and SOF2.
I think vino is right, the reservoir is too big for production by a single well.