Reservoir Simulators Comparison

[reservoirengineer]

----

[reservoirengineer]

----

[temr]

reservoirengineer as they small russina company the cost approximently 70 k USd for 1 licence but better if you will contact them directly they do speak english
For testing this softawere you can download demo directly from the link

[link Point to another website Only the registered members can access] in archive you will find simulator and demo data sets
All of them (suimulators) are the same in term of algos they use to solve 2 things in a time step
1. Pressure
2. Saturation
But this baby ( Tnav) is awesome if you want for exmple make fast history match
For example my last project 300 active cell model , active aqufer 130 wells 15 years of history
Petrel +Tnav 2 weeks for match Watercut and Oil rates
Try it

[reservoirengineer]

----

[geophysicien1]

please some one can upload the kingdon sofware 32 bit with licence i need it urgently thankyou
this is my email geophysicien1@hotmail.fr

[geophysicien1]

please some one can upload the ------- sofware 32 bit with licence i need it urgently thankyou
this is my email geophysicien1@hotmail.fr

[geophysicien1]

please someone can upload the ------- software 32 bit i need it urgently
this is my email geophysicien1@hotmail.fr

[Avers]

For Black Oil models I prefer Eclipse. For compositional - VIP. I think there are a lot of better simulators , but you should be realistic - if you are international level RE you shoud be expert in ECL. All other sims are benefits, not a core.
For example - the best simulator which allows you to do almost everything is MoReS from Shell. But who cary about it? )))

[ahmedm]

tnav ----------------------

aamm2025@hotmail.com

[ahmedm]

i think currently the more famous commercial simulators are Eclipse and CMG
esp CMG more friendly in use some how easier from Eclipse
CMG has very good cabability in thermal and chemical (STARS)

just an openion
thanks

[rinrin]

The best simulator software should give your life more easier, to let your "Brain" more time in analyis and monitor your input and output...nothing standard should be in this case, the standard is should be your knowledge to do the right history matching and forecasting, instead as " a cliker or typer".
Thanks

[ahmedm]

thanks rinrin

your note is highly appreciated