<

Results 1 to 12 of 32

Thread: Imbibition curves

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Vinomarky comments are on target. In my experience I have never been involved in a WAG process and to be honest we simply never worried about the effect as the fields were small, late in their production cycle. There was no way in this world that the necessary data would be made available or was even possible to obtain by the contracting company. If the company is say SHELL, ARAMCO you can bet they will get the necessary data.

    I was looking for a good picture of this hysteresis process and found this related to SOIL science :-) But it is clear so worth looking at

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]
    Here is something related to WAG processes

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]
    These guys have the ECLIPSE data files here

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]
    And here is something that may answer vinomarky question from a place I would least expect to find it, MIT. And they did have lab data to match against.

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]

    The results of the simulations presented here indicate
    that WAG simulation is quite sensitive to the treatment
    of relative permeability hysteresis. Depending on the
    hysteretic model used, predictions of oil recovery may
    be as much as 15% higher than without hysteresis
    (Table 2). Among the different models typically available
    in reservoir simulators, the largest improvements
    in recovery predictions are obtained with the three-phase
    WAG hysteresis model in combination with the
    Stone I interpolation method. This choice is precisely
    the one that agrees with experimental data best.
    Again, cost , saturation history are issues that make it all very difficult to do as vinomarky has said. Issues that in the Real World you will need to get around by SIMPLIFYING the problem.

    It does not mean you should ignore them, but you should keep them in mind relative to WHERE you are working. SHELL Oil, OK mention that you need it, XYZ Oil Company, forget it, they won't spend the money as they are probable just interested in knowing where to drill and move on to the next project (or they give you 2 weeks to do the work and then need the results).

    How to get out of the Jail

    [link Point to another website Only the registered members can access]

    Last edited by Shakespear; 10-01-2010 at 12:52 PM.
    Regards

    “Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
    —Big Oil Executive

  •   

Similar Threads

  1. compressors curves correction
    By omem84 in forum Oil And Gas Process
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-10-2013, 03:39 AM
  2. Paterson Stress Curves
    By ranwedzi in forum Mechanical Engineering
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-09-2013, 07:48 PM
  3. End scaling in Kr/Pc curves
    By arm in forum Reservoir
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-27-2011, 03:39 PM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-16-2010, 04:20 PM
  5. Atlas of Fatigue Curves BY ASM
    By Franco Vella Junior in forum Materials Science &Corrosion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-15-2009, 02:54 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •