<

  • .

  • Relative Permeability Question

    Ok....so....the problem is that...I dont understand the physical concept of rescaling the rel perms....say for example in my SCAL data....the rel perms are given relative to the oil permeability....which are very easy to use...because the analysis would involve a Kro(end-point) as 1...which would be easy to use and then the whole emphasis would be on Krw(end point).........

    Now....if I use the relative permeability as reported that means that I have taken the absolute permeability of the reservoir saturated with oil....although what actually happens is that the absolute permeability is measured with helium...so I have a rel perm which is oil relative...but the absolute perm is that of air....so the simulation model is inconsistent

    I understand the point and rescaled the relative permeability data...with respect to the air permeabiluity....and used the data again with different Kro and Krw end point......and that sorted out the problem....

    My question here is...thatt is there a way that I analyse the rel perms reported as relative to oil permeability and use the same in the simulator.....and report the grid block properties as absolute oil permeabilities ...not air.... because then the system would be corresponding to each other...shall be highly obliged......if some one can help...

    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Samad
    This article was originally published in forum thread: Relative Permeability Question started by samadali20 View original post
    Comments 8 Comments
    1. skumar123's Avatar
      skumar123 -
      Hi Samad, Thanks for a good question. I can understand your dilemma. But the solution is simple. First of all we do not use air permeability in a simulation model. We use Klinkenberg permeability which is the air permeability in when the mean pressure is mathematically infinite. At infinite pressure air or any gas would behave like liquid, hence this Klinkenberg permeability is equal to liquid permeability i.e. oil or water at 100% saturation. In other words Koil(100% oil saturation) is equal to Kwater(100% water saturation). This is also equal to Klinkenberg air permeability. Hence in the simulation model if the above concept is used there is nothing like model is inconsistent. Now the question may arise in your mind then why the hell laboratory carry out the air permeability measurement not the oil or water absolute perm measurement? The reason is air permeability measurement is cheaper and faster than if we use oil or water.
      As a guideline you must convert the air permeability into Klinkenberg permeability at envisaged stress.
    1. samadali20's Avatar
      samadali20 -
      Thanks a lot skumar for the explanation....I have seen the klingerberg slippage correction factor....Just wanted to confirm.....that I need to change all the perms reported in my simulation model to Klinkenberg corrected perms....and then use the relative permeability data...and then when I analyze the rel perm data.....say ...either with respect to oil...or with respect to gas......it does not matter...because...now I have klinkenberg corrected absolute permeabilities....for my model......

      AM I right in doing this.........

      Thanks a lot.....I am highly obliged....................
    1. skumar123's Avatar
      skumar123 -
      Sorry for the late reply. Samad, when you use kliken perm and porosity cross plot at given stress condition and apply the relationship in your model based on rock types the permeability in the model you get is the Kliken one. Secondly on the issue of relative perm the absolute perm is always any one of them as you mentioned e.g. 100 oil or 100 water or Kliken berg pne.
      Regards
    1. abdelkrim's Avatar
      abdelkrim -
      Hello all, I am new here and I am happy to discuss with and share many good things,
      I understand that we use the relative permeability based on air only when we don't have with oil or water ?

      I have another question about normalize and de-normalize relative permeability, could you give the procedure to do that
      because I am confused about that, best regards
    1. abdelkrim's Avatar
      abdelkrim -
      In other words, I have a SCAL data how I can prepare it for ECLIPSE model
      thank you
    1. FOXNEW's Avatar
      FOXNEW -
      abdelkrim
      I am preparing for a thread that will cover the SCAL analysis (Rel. Perm, Rock Typing methods and JFunction & the Saturation Height Function), I will include spreadsheets with examples, maybe tomorrow i will start it depending on my free time.

      Regards
    1. OTHER's Avatar
      OTHER -
      Can anyone give me the end points for the relative permeabilities for a dolomite reservoir depth between (2700 – 2900 m upper serdj ) for any field.
    1. OTHER's Avatar
      OTHER -
      Can anyone give me the end points for the relative permeabilities for a dolomite reservoir depth between (2700 – 2900 m upper serdj ) for any field.
  • .

  • Recent Threads

    ProfessionalSS

    MicroMine2026

    Thread Starter: ProfessionalSS

    Hello
    MicroMine2025 is available now:

    pss_cheap@hotmail.com

    Last Post By: ProfessionalSS Yesterday, 03:21 PM Go to last post
  • Recent Activity

    cpchonburi

    ASME BPVC 2025 Edition

    Thread Starter: cpchonburi

    Last Post By: makan Today, 04:35 PM Go to last post
  • .

  • ..

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40