thank u sir
At present i m in a critical situation in my project. My objective is to discuss the effect of well spacing on ultimate recovery, and we are using petrel & eclipse simulators in order to achieve it. I have gone thru the reservoir concepts of well spacing under some scenarios. As it is my final year B.tech project so there is a bit of time constraint associated with it (6-12 months).
I am looking for a secondary type depletion drive reservoir (Pi < bubble pt. pressure) so that we can obtain a significant difference in ultimate recovery under various cases. Is this approach right ?
or can you suggest a good idea/theme if the project title is "A comprehensive study of effect of well spacing on ultimate recovery"
I guess I am not quite sure where you are going with this. As your first work showed, there is no general relationship to find the optimum spacing as there is simply too many variables which changed from field to field. The methodology is clear enough as to how to find it, trial and error with surface and economic constraints.
If the company is small and the field the approach will be equally simple to answer the question. If the company is Statoil the approach will be very sophisticated, simulations to find the optimal well distribution. The variable driving everything will be economics.
Regards
“Considering the many productive uses of petroleum, burning it for fuel is like burning a Picasso for heat.”
—Big Oil Executive
Thank you all..but if i'm provided well test data,how i can estimate the drainage area?
Bookmarks