SKM v8

i know about the exe (it is actually a policy they impose in order to block malware spreading on GD and Gmail) however when talking about zips it doesn't(shouldn't) flag easily an exe *inside* of the zip archive. that said *something* was found that they didn't liked in the exe's content and together with having the right extension gets to be flagged and this is bad for SKM (they should contact google for whitelisting or maybe to find out why they were actually flagged).

mistery for me how google decides if something is infected as i didn't found much detail on the steps they do or on what algorithm they use. same exe goes clean 57/57 on virustotal.

ionioni* please share the address link. :)

[QUOTE=ionioni;337093]i know about the exe (it is actually a policy they impose in order to block malware spreading on GD and Gmail) however when talking about zips it doesn't(shouldn't) flag easily an exe *inside* of the zip archive. that said *something* was found that they didn't liked in the exe's content and together with having the right extension gets to be flagged and this is bad for SKM (they should contact google for whitelisting or maybe to find out why they were actually flagged).

mistery for me how google decides if something is infected as i didn't found much detail on the steps they do or on what algorithm they use. same exe goes clean 57/57 on virustotal.[/QUOTE]

i have also experienced unable to attach zip and rar files with exe inside. what i usually did is to rename the file without extension. and rewrite it after downloading.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[QUOTE=surgeArrester;337102]i have also experienced unable to attach zip and rar files with exe inside. what i usually did is to rename the file without extension. and rewrite it after downloading. [/QUOTE]

yes* that is I usually did as well* renaming the "exe" file with some other extension and rename it back to its original extension after downloading.

Unless I'm missing some point; why don't you use Win Rar (it's free) then when giving it a password also press the option to encrypt the file names. Then nothing can tell what's in it. Nothing and no one. ( Except probably ionioni but he's probably some sort of new generation AI ) :cocksure: LOL
[url]http://www.rarlab.com/download.htm[/url]
.
.
. .

[QUOTE=ingo_dingo;337172]Unless I'm missing some point; why don't you use Win Rar (it's free) then when giving it a password also press the option to encrypt the file names. Then nothing can tell what's in it. Nothing and no one. ( Except probably ionioni but he's probably some sort of new generation AI )
[url]http://www.rarlab.com/download.htm[/url][/QUOTE]

in my experience* the same thing happens..


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Then I assume that it assumes anything it can't see or test is suspect. It however doesn't check if it's larger than 4.1 Gig. (Because that's what it said with that ETAP 16 ISO file.)
Does it bother with checking a RAR within a RAR or a RAR within a ZIP? Perhaps it's looking for copyright material as well. It's getting harder and harder to be sneaky. Google can't sell your private information to advertisers and third parties if it can't read it. Google's even sneakier than us.
.
.
.
.
. .

if the is in iso format* i think it assumes it is a dvd image and can do nothing on it.

sometimes for example the windows defender* deletes automatically some ******s that we think that are okay. to avoid being deleted* i usually save them in an iso format and mount it via virtual drive* that way* the antivirus cant delete.

and it does check the files with a rar with a rar..

that why i normally rename it or in iso format..


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That's a great way around the problem.

[QUOTE=mukhriz;337009]I can evaluate both of your ***** and ionioni's... :) :) :) :)[/QUOTE]

so... what's new in 8?

[QUOTE=ionioni;337817]so... what's new in 8?[/QUOTE]

I think nothing is so much interesting in the new version

[QUOTE=ionioni;337817]so... what's new in 8?[/QUOTE]

Hi. Some change are intresting* like

- New study module – Underground & Aboveground Cable Ampacity/Ductbank calculations
- New Module – Coordination Evaluation
- Added new short circuit methods for Arc Flash Evaluation
- Expanded the “Device Fail to Operate” option which applies to all Mains or as specified in the devices.
- New Zone Selective Interlocking modeling (ZSI)
- Added infinite bus option for utility component

By the way* anyone can share it?

Thanks!