All Blog Entries

Originally Posted by codigo98ii

Dear friends of the forum

You can share the following API standards published in 2016 - 2017:

1. Recommended Practice 1109 Marking Liquid Petroleum Pipeline Facilities 5th edition
2. Recommended Practice 1133 Guidelines for Onshore Hydrocarbon Pipelines Affecting High Consequence Floodplains 2nd edition
3. Recommended Practice 1160 Managing System Integrity for Hazardous Liquid Pipelines 3rd edition
4. Recommended Practice 1162 Public Awareness Programs for Pipeline Operators 3rd edition
5. Standard 1164 Pipeline SCADA Security 3rd edition
6. Recommended Practice 1177 QMS for New Pipeline Construction 1st edition (http://ballots.api.org/pipeline/ball...allot_3916.pdf)
7. Technical Report 1178 Data Management and Integration Guidelines 1st edition (http://ballots.api.org/pipeline/ball...allot_3935.pdf)
8. Technical Report 1179 Guidelines for Use of Hydrostatic Testing as an Integrity Management Tool 1st edition (http://ballots.api.org/pipeline/TR11...sting_4273.pdf)

Thanks

Codigo

Attached Files

• TR1179_1Ed_HydrostaticTesting_4273.pdf (1.43 MB, 61 views)
• 1178_DataMgmt&Integration_1E_ballot_3935.pdf (1.39 MB, 59 views)
• 1177_PipelineConstructionQMS_1E_ballot_3916.pdf (1.25 MB, 163 views)

Originally Posted by CANDICEDALAIS

Hi guys* can someone please upload a library of PQR WPS and Welders qualifications for ASME and EN ISO
for half inch; 2 inch ; and 6 inch carbon Steel and stainless steel pipe. As well as a few plates that are carbon Steel and stainless steel. Pdf. Would be great.

Originally Posted by Rammohan

Check this link. File has been updated.

https://www.4shared.com/rar/3lEvcY-D...de_-_Vol1.html

Pass: egpet.net

This is the 3rd edition* today the download is OK.

Thank

See
http://www.egpet.net/vb/threads/8850...146#post347146

Dear Mechen*
plz re-upload Volume 1 Fourth Edition* the file is corrupted.
Thanks in advance.

Originally Posted by Marty Thompson

https://telegram.me/joinchat/CfG2TD2yU-dXI2qRkCtqTA

Thanks Marty* you are the Leader of an excellent team.

Originally Posted by SHEMYY

FRIENDS - TRY THIS SITE - SOME PARTS ARE THERE :
https://web.telegram.org/#/im?p=s100...50585449857193

ENJOY .

Dear SHEMYY*
how i can't see the file on that cloud. How I can see it?

We have been experiencing shallow gas flows (gas broaching) following an abnormal sound in one of the gas wells* since July 2011. This was later identified as a case of underground blowout. One of the contributing factors was erosion of tubing due to sand ingress and annular pressure buildup. Several attempts were made to address the problem by killing the well* drilling of relief well and vent holes* etc. Although the extent of gas flow was contained to a great extent* the same is continuing. The contamination of ground water* fire incidents* etc. are some of the issues that need to be addressed. Complaints of shallow gas flows are reported by people residing in the area neighboring to the well and need to be resolved.

Can anyone suggest a remedy to this persistent problem?

Tags: completion, hse, petroleum, production, well intervention

Categories

Uncategorized

Originally Posted by himmelstern

there is a video instalation procedure of how to cr.a.ck or pa.tch ETAP 16.0

Friend I need etap 16.1 please tell me how to get it urgently

Hello*

I am doing the branch tee reinforcement pad requirement calculation according to EN 13480-3 section 8.4.3. I have some queries as below.

(1) In Equation 8.4.3-4 ( lpl <= ls). I have calculated the effective reinforcement of shell pipe (ls) value according to equation 8.4.1-2 which is coming around 190 mm. So According to the equation I can use the reinforcement pad width less than ls means less than 190 mm. If I follow the above equation * it will never satisfy the final equation 8.4.3-6. it seems this equation is not correct.
If code restrict the reinforcement pad width how we can satisfy the final equation without increasing the pad width where reinforcement pad width is also limited to eas according to equation 8.4.3-5. Refer attached code page attachment (EN13480-3-Page-82.pdf). Please suggest.

(2) EN13480-3 equation 8.4.3-5 condition eapl<=eas shall be satisfy.
I am using the reinforcement pad thickness same as shell thickness* means pad will be cut from shell pipe during fabrication.

I am using the nominal pad thickness same as shell thickness 16 mm with assuming same corrosion allowances. Refer below calculation.
My nominal shell thickness en=16 mm. c0=3.4* c1=0.3 mm.so eas=16-3.4-0.3= 12.3 mm.
Plate thickness used enpl=16mm. c0=3.4* c1=0.3 mm. so eapl=12.3 mm.

Is my calculation & understanding is correct.

As in brief above code restrict the reinforcement pad thickness as well as width to compensate the cutting area for branch.

Please find attached my detail calculation. (Terna Reinforcement pad Calculation30052017.pdf)

Tags: branch reinforcement pad, corrosion allowance, en13480-3, en13480-3:2012, tee reinforcing pads

Categories

Petrochemical , Industrial / Manufacturing Engineers , Engineering Codes, Standards & Certifications , General & petroleum News , Miscellaneous